Posts Tagged ‘LOTD’

LOTD: 10/16/2009

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Happy Friday everyone!  There are only 15 days until Halloween or more importantly only 68 shopping days until Christmas.  Until then, enjoy these links of the day.

(more…)

LOTD: 9/8/09

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

Here are some “back-to-school” links of note from Twitter & FriendFeed.  Later this week we’ll be publishing a handy guide for things you can do to start the “school year” off right.

  • SEO lessons from Google News – insight from Google themselves on how items for Google News are ranked.  Important from a PR POV when helping clients craft news and announcements.
  • MSNBC acquires EveryBlock – first Newsvine, now EB (a major player in the hyperlocal news/aggregation world).  Some pretty interesting moves.
  • WordPress.com becomes real-time – RSS muscles back on to the scene and now millions of blogs can push their updates into the social web.  Pretty big step in terms of tech with a lot more, I’m sure, to come.

LOTD: 7/15/09

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

9 Ways

  • Mediaite launched to bruising traffic and much debate.  A fresh new look at the media industry as a whole.
  • David Finch on what social media is not.  Most importantly?  It’s not a short-term fix, a solid business culture commitment is required.
  • Micah Baldwin on the lie of community.  Technology and modern marketing has shifted our perceptions of what a community is in the digital world.  Good lessons on getting back to basics.

LOTD: 5/29/09

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Time to turn all these open tabs in Google Chrome into fun links for you!  As always, we’re sharing these on Twitter and FriendFeed.

  • Vanity metrics vs. Actionable metrics – Eric Ries talks about really making measurement work and solving problems, not just finding numbers that don’t mean a whole lot.  For example, you have 5 billion page views?  Great.  Why?  How?
  • Human Motivation & Your Brand – I’m glad more people are looking at the psychology behind marketing.  It helps us do our jobs better and more effectively.  There are reasons behind why people share things on Facebook.  Match these needs up first with your objectives and then go from there.
  • Be there before the sale.  Why are we still using the word “campaigns” if this world is supposed to be built on long-term, sustained relationships?

In mathematical sociologyinterpersonal ties are defined as information-carrying connections between people. Interpersonal ties, generally, come in three varieties: strongweak, or absent. Weak social ties, it is argued, are responsible for the majority of the embeddedness and structure of social networks in society as well as the transmission of information through these networks. Specifically, more novel information flows to individuals through weak rather than strong ties. Because our close friends tend to move in the same circles that we do, the information they receive overlaps considerably with what we already know. Acquaintances, by contrast, know people that we do not, and thus receive more novel information.

LOTD: 5/12/09

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Some can’t-miss stuff from the past month (as always, we’re sharing these on our FriendFeed & Twitter):

  • CubeTree launched yesterday.  The internal comms. sector is heating up.  We’re keeping an eye out for early returns on how it stacks up against services like ClearSpace & SocialText.
  • Geoff Livingston has a great post over on The Buzz Bin about what’s really valuable to a community.  He highlights a week where he didn’t have any great blog posts but the photos he put on Flickr for SOBcon ended up being super-popular.  Great lessons:  don’t always “follow the herd,” do what you do best and – most importantly – make sure other people find it useful.

LOTD: 4/2/09 – The April Serious Edition?

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

The day after April Fools on the web always seems like a bad hangover. Everyone is struggling to right themselves and get back to work after a day full of bad jokes and tip-toeing around the web unsure if all the tweets they’re reading are actually true or not. The few that caught my eye:

Moving on

The fun ‘n games are over.  Here are some posts that we’ve been tracking.  Pardon the volume, there has been a lot of good stuff bouncing around:

Miss LOTD?  Want More?  We’re always sharing stuff on FriendFeed and Twitter.

LOTD: 3/2/09 – The Meta Snow Edition

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Since March came in like a lion and left the East Coast with some snow overnight, we’re catching up on some notable reading here at OTD.  What about the meta?  Well, two new features:  FriendFeed & Skribit.  We’re trying out FriendFeed to not only aggregate all of our content around the web but give you an easier way to keep track of the stuff we find noteworthy (usually, in the past, what would make up these daily LOTD posts).  Not to worry, when the time is right, we’ll still call out important items but always keep an eye out in the sidebar for everything hot off the presses.

We’re also testing out Skribit.  Ever want to suggest that we write about something here on OTD?  See something we missed?  Now you can suggest it!  Check it out here or in the sidebar.  On to the links…

  • Skittles jumped off the deep-end over the weekend.  Their homepage is now Twitter’s search function, bringing up whatever people are saying that involves the word “skittles.”  A big step, yes, but it’ll be more important to see what happens from here on out after the novelty wears off.  I bet this experiment, for Skittles, is more about a correlation between other brand activity they do and how people talk about them.  Capturing the love and the ephemera conversation is a biproduct.  The real test is the tone of these responses up against how Skittles markets themselves elsewhere.
  • Media 2.0 Best Practices:  we’ll keep an eye on how this evolves.  Trying to standardize the ethics of participation is equally important as trying to figure out how to measure it.  I hope by this time next year, these big questions are a lot closer to being answered.
  • News as a hook for context:  the media industry is knocking down doors trying to figure out ways to make news, itself, the vehicle that brings in gobs of traffic.  If we’re dealing with empowering the community as a goal (which it should be in almost every execution on the web) – think about context.  That is where the long-term value lies.
  • Facebook & tribes:  proof positive that broadcasting isn’t the same as engaging.  These usage stats confirm that social media might be expanding our reach but, at the same time, it’s not expanding our actual circles of interaction.  For example, an average female on Facebook who might be friends with at least 500 people?  Usually only messages and chats with 16 people while commenting on content for only 26 of her friends.

Photo credit, hamed.

LOTD: 1/29/08

Thursday, January 29th, 2009
  • 1,000 true fans:  Matt Thompson makes a solid case for this approach to a viable business models on the web.  Especially in relation to how the news industry can pick up the slack.
  • Reviewing new media sure can be stressful, Virginia Heffernan recaps her adventures with a one Mr. Fallon.  Choice quote:  ”There’s no way to maintain an ex cathedra advantage when you’re cavorting in a circus ring.”

LOTD: 12/17/08

Wednesday, December 17th, 2008
  • Can’t wait for the new season of Mad Men to start up again? Calm your nerves with this great report on the characters coming to life on Twitter.
  • Not the first and certainly not the last (but maybe the one w/ the most promise so far?):  snaps to MTV for picking up/developing a show w/ the crew from CollegeHumor.

LOTD: 12/16/08

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008
  • Need some good books to start 2009 with? Lee Odden put together a great list of some standards in the social media marketing world (via thilk’s shared).
  • Virginia Heffernan takes a close look at the type of content today’s media world is generating and, quite frankly, why a lot of it isn’t working (see also – Kevin Kelly discussing the generative value of content):

Then there’s the troublesome third argument, the one we know is true. This is the one that admits that the content that thrives in the new distribution-and-display systems is suspiciously different from the American popular culture we used to love even 10 years ago. Thrillers, it seems, don’t flourish on Hulu. No one is reading a six-part investigative series about mayoral malfeasance on Twitter. And if it’s the afterthought message boards — the ones moderated by interns — that draw all the traffic, why are we in old media pouring so much money and time into “main event” programming that goes unread and unviewed?