Archive for November, 2008

LOTD: 11/26/08

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008
  • Joel Johnson calls out some excessive, “viral” commenting on Boing Boing Gadgets.
  • Brian Solis unveils @MicroPR, using Twitter as a tool to connect the media community.  Very similar to how HARO is using e-mail.
  • Sling puts their hat in the online video ring and launches a video portal, going up against Joost & Hulu.  Early returns say that this is the real deal:  good content, design and most importantly - a hardware tie-in, letting you stream from any Sling box you own (giving access to Live TV and premium saved content).
  • Amazon.com is trying to break the mold a bit this holiday season:  user-generated PR.  They’ve assembled a team of customers to actively write reviews for hot gifts being pitched to reporters.  Keep a close eye on this one, surely more to come.
  • Have some downtime this weekend?  Rex’s list-mecca for 2008.   
We’ll take a bit of a break for the Thanksgiving holiday and be back at it in December!  Lots of great stuff coming down the pipe.  Stay tuned!

LOTD: 11/25/08

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008
  • Both via John Gruber:
    • Values of n is shutting down, leaving Stikkit and I Want Sandy users in the dust on 12/8.  Both properties, intellectually, have been aquired by Twitter but there aren’t any plans to integreate just yet.  Hmm…money might be behind the recent spurn of Facebook but could this be Twitter shuffling the deck a bit?
    • It Died:  ”A compendium of what services and companies are no longer available for our Internet pleasure and use.”
  • Still on the e-mail kick a bit, Racked has a great feature that summarizes most of the major daily missives into an easy-to-digest post:  Email Scan.
  • Even though this is a paid spot, Microsoft hired the team at Common Craft to explain lifestreaming.  Great high level benefits explanation (via mark).

LOTD: 11/24/08

Monday, November 24th, 2008

LOTD: 11/21/08

Friday, November 21st, 2008

Hot off the presses and certainly deserving of its own call-out is a great article that will be appearing in The Screens Issue of this weekend’s New York Times Magainze.

In Multiscreen Mad Men, Jack Hitt moderates a discussion about digital media and the direction it’s heading:

Palmer: There’s a difference. A Super Bowl ad is broadcast and everybody sees the same ad, and it comes from a single source. And so you may have a preference as to whether you liked this ad in comparison to this other ad in the block of ads that you just saw. But when you feel like you’ve discovered something on the Internet, it’s a different relationship to the brand. Say I was one of the first thousand people who saw that Cadbury gorilla ad — where he drums along to Phil Collins — and I send that out to all my friends. There’s a pride that I have in having discovered that, a connection that you actually can’t get with broadcast advertising.

Some great stuff in the issue all-around, eagerly awaiting your Saturday morning coffee.

Brands in 2009

Friday, November 21st, 2008

Looking ahead, as many are laying out plans and budgets for the year in front of us, I thought it’d be important to revisit two major realities of today’s digital world:  the big-picture role brands play online and the truth behind engagement, participation, etc.

One “old” post I constantly find myself going back to is David Armano talking about brands being facilitators online instead of, traditionally, broadcasters.  Using this thinking often during brainstorms and client meetings, the point here is that as the communication landscape changes - so must a brand and how they react, participate and work with their audiences.  From David’s post:

 

Brand As Facilitator

This means that like any good facilitator, they get off center stage, move over to the side and let others do the talking. But just like any good facilitator, the brands who succeed in this direction need to master it as an both and art and science. Good facilitators know how to actively listen, how to create environments which stimulate productive conversations and interactions and most importantly they add incredible value even though they may come across as the least vocal in the group.

Another truth to be mindful of in 2009 is the reality behind participation. As marketers, we like to think every audience we try to reach is 100% engaged and digitally active. Sadly, as Jake points out, that isn’t so.

90-9-1

Most of today’s web community falls into those three buckets.  The large majority being an audience who never really engages themslves, taking content and moving on.  A small percentage of people actually mold and adust what is out there  - but only what is out there, nothing comes from them directly.  Finally, the 1% who actually create and drive activity.

A great stat that Jake provides to back-up the 90-9-1 principle:

Just 0.16% of all visitors to YouTube upload videos to it, and 0.2% of visitors to Flickr upload photos.

Even if you’re a “creator,” think about how many photos or videos you upload in a day vs. the amount you passively digest from links found online or passed on from friends.  I’d bet that ratio supports the principle behind Jake’s great single-serving site.

In 2009, we should focus on changing both of these realities for the better. The opportunity is there to level the playing field and for brands to become better transparent, active participants with not just the media but their customers and the digital world as a whole. In doing so, hopefully we’ll see the facilitator model be more popular and the 90-9-1 percentages begin to adjust themselves, moving closer and closer to the 100% “participation nirvana” we’re all seeking.

What do you want to see happen in 2009 for the world of PR, interactive marketing, etc.?