« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »

October 31, 2006

Book Review: Word of Mouth Marketing by Andy Sernovitz

Andy Sernovitz has written a book that, quite frankly, everyone should read. I don't care if you're in marketing, human resources, customer service or are a C-level executive, Word of Mouth Marketing has something for you

What Sernovitz has done is break down word-of-mouth-marketing into its core components, and he's done so in a way that doesn't use a lot of – or any, really – industry jargon or inside jokes. What he does do is make it clear that word of mouth about your company, regardless of size, location, demographic or product offerings, is already being generated. Whether you had anything to do with that or not is almost secondary. The conversation is happening. Sernovitz makes it clear that you have two options when it comes to this pre-existing conversation. You can either join in and make sure that you're reaping all the benefits that come with that or ignore it and not participate, in which case you will pay the costs (and they can be significant) such an aloof stance can result in.

But oh, what benefits Sernovitz dangles in front of you. Reputation management, increased buzz and other such prizes await those who know how, as he puts it, to enable the talkers, seed the conversation and otherwise encourage people to talk about the company. He's not talking about paid or massively coordinated word-of-mouth campaigns. While there might be a place for them (I'm not a fan but some people swear by them) the tactics Sernovitz puts out there for use are low cost (often free) and are all about keeping the conversation authentic by energizing people who are already doing the talking without tainting the process with money

The tactics and suggestions Sernovitz lays out aren't likely to be embraced by people who still believe that the professionals are the only ones who should be controlling the message, thank you very much. Nor is this something that's going to be an easy sell to higher-ups who demand that things fit nicely int a spreadsheet or slide-deck. He does give some ways to make word-of-mouth fit into those calculations but at the end of the day WOM is still going to be fuzzier than old-media ad buying and flier printing.

While much of the book focuses on how WOM is being enabled to an unprecedented degree by the ease of online publishing, Sernovitz makes it clear that offline conversations are just as important. He gives example after example on how to identify who is or can be doing your talking for you, both in the real world as well as online.

There's an idea that I think I first read from Joseph Jaffe that the best advertising in the world will be completely destroyed by a bad user-experience and that flashy ads can actually build up expectations that are destined to be dashed by that experience. Sernovitz takes the same attitude when he makes it clear that one of the chief ways to enable and encourage positive word-of-mouth is to train customer service staff members on ways to encourage people to spread the word themselves. As an example he cites a study that shows that people who hear about a friend's bad experience somewhere are five times as likely to not use that company again as the person who actually had that experience. If everyone of your bad customer experiences is leading to a five-fold loss of revenue you need to start brainstorming ways right now on how to improve the interactions between the company and the customer.

Let me give you an example of how much Sernovitz gets what he's preaching. Last week I read a post by Mack Collier where he was crowing about an advance review copy of Word of Mouth Marketing he had gotten. (What Mack was actually doing was exactly what Mack does and Andy knew he would do - talk about innovative marketing) I dropped a comment basically just busting in a friendly way on Mack for how “important” he was getting that he was getting such a treat. 20 minutes later Sernovitz IM'd me asking for my mailing address so he could send me a copy. He got that I was, as he calls it, a “talker” and that sending me a book was a small cost for the potential word of mouth it could generate.

Before I finish up, let me share one quote with you that I feel sums up Sernovitz's arguments quite well as serves, I think, as kind of a foundation for the entire idea of genuine, consumer-driven word-of-mouth:

"Word of mouth is so effective because of the natural credibility that comes from real people with no profit or agenda tied to their recommendations. It's those "people like us" whom we look for and listen to."

I can't recommend Word of Mouth Marketing enough. It's a wonderful compilation of all the “walk with your community” and “enable the community” ideas that so many of us in the marketing and PR world have been espousing for so long. And coming from Sernovitz, who's the president of the Word or Mouth Marketing Association, it has a level of authority that hopefully can break through the reluctance of those who don't know how to embrace such radical – but effective – ideas.

LOTD: October 31st Part Deux

This'll teach Tom to post a Links of the Day at 8AM Central time.

  • JotSpot, one of the more popular entry-level web-based wiki apps out there, is now part of the Google empire. Am I the only one who didn't see that coming at all?

  • Peter Shankman recounts an exchange with a reporter that proves the most valuable asset you can have as a PR representative is a product that generates genuine excitement.

  • Some corporate executives still need to stop worrying and love consumer-generated content for what it is.

  • Were the flurry of corporate deals just before Google bought YouTube part of a plan by the record labels to get out of paying artists for the works put on the video sharing sites?

  • Susan Merritt points out another example of a mainstream newspaper that seems to have not attributed at best and lifted directly from at worst a story that originally broke on BoingBoing. (Warning: The site Susan links to is NSFW)

  • CitizenBay is a very cool idea that brings social bookmarking to local news, complete with RSS feed.

  • Josh Hallett posts the answers he provided to a college student seeking opinions on blogging and such.

  • John Cass turns to the community to get some feedback as he writes his book. Go help the man out.

  • Conde Nast is buying Reddit, the popular social-bookmarking site.
  • LOTD: October 31

    • Nike is dropping some serious coin [pronounced: kwan] on the new Nike Air Zoom Lebron IV, including being the only sponsor for Wednesday's 6pm SportsCenter on ESPN, plus a ton of marketing and advertising online.
    • Missed posting this link last week about how November spells more WiFi on ferries in Washington state. Wait, they have WiFi on the ferry? Hello, New York Waterway?
    • Okay, so it's not really new mediaish, but it's interesting anyway. Weblogs, Inc. and Netscape pal C.K. Sample and his wife Kristin have a cute little new puppy, and the video to prove it.
    • Comcast gets smart and will finally deploy TiVo, getting those of us who have used the higher-quality product the ability to not have to deal with garbage anymore.
    • Yahoo! and Nissan are playing nicey nicey when it comes to live music online
    • Good luck keeping your copyrighted music up on MySpace

    October 30, 2006

    LOTD: October 30th

    • EQO Communications is going to allow users of BlackBerrys and other mobile devices to access Skype and multi-platform IM clients. (via fellow MWW Group-er Brian Williams)
    • Don't ask Acer senior VP Jim Wong to pen any testimonials for Windows Vista. He says the basic version is essentially useless and will force people to upgrade for any of the cool new features, costs that PC builders will have to absorb.
    • I have to agree with Steve Hall and Eric Eggertson. Everyone seems to be beating up on the crayon team over their debut in Second Life when I suspect the real problems people have are with other corporations. These guys get social media and I'm sure they'll do good work, so let's cut them some slack.
    • Nothing like a little controversy to drum up interest in a couple movies that otherwise would have been small-time releases otherwise.
    • Lifehacker has some cool tips on how to use public Bloglines profiles to find relevant feeds.
    • Jackie Huba is looking for help remembering a specific blog that she came across but now can't find. The blog features pictures of a guy opening up new tech gadgets like PDAs and such.

    October 26, 2006

    LOTD: October 26

    • Okay, so I caught this one last night. But is it just me, or is the fact that uncrate has so much to say about the portion of its readership that is still using Internet Explorer the ultimate in testaments when it comes to online?
    • Stop Googling, Googlers!
    • Wow, have people started grasping the fact that reviews on Websites could actually be helpful?

    Opening up the crayon box

    Unfortunately, neither Tom or I were able to make it, due to prior commitments, to the Second Life launch of crayon, the new agency founded by Joe Jaffe, Shel Holtz, Neville Hobson and CC Chapman. But that doesn't mean others weren't there. From the reports that Neville and Joe have put up it was quite an event.

    Thankfully these guys are as good at promoting themselves through new media as they will be at promoting their clients through new media. They've setup an agency blog and a Flickr set documenting the launch event. They even announced the creation of crayon in a very new media friendly press release that's complete with links, pictures to download and other goodies that make blogging the release that much easier.

    The emphasis of crayon is on conversation, the reality that marketing is no longer a one way street.

    October 25, 2006

    Constantin's custom search now on Open The Dialogue

    Constatin Basturea has created a Custom Google Search that contains the 500+ blogs on his PR and Communications Blog List. It's such a fantastic idea - exactly along the lines of something I've been looking for for some time now - that I've added it to the sidebar here on OTD.

    Many thanks to Constantin for all the hard work that I'm sure went into this.

    LOTD: October 25

    • Wired has a story by Jennifer Granick about all the nifty things that Web 2.0ish services are doing to improve your overall voting experience this year
    • The Yahoo! Search folks have announced their latest Yahoo! Toolbar (for IE) and Yahoo! Bookmarks
    • Declan McCullagh and Anne Broache share the worst political Websites they've come across
    • Ringtones might end up getting cheaper, says Ars Technica's Nate Anderson. I guess people haven't started buying Xingtone yet, have they?
    • Internet addiction? Oh, please
    • Think your cellphone isn't going to become the center of the universe? Sure, some of the music playing ones aren't exactly pretty just yet, but as hard drives get bigger and styling becomes more awesome, that'll change. In any case, you can now get your train ticket delivered to your mobile on one train line running from London.

    October 24, 2006

    Web 2.0 finally produces tangible results

    Flickr claims it helped make a baby. What has your Web 2.0 service done for the world?

    Why Blogging Matters to me

    There's an absolutely fascinating meme spreading around the series of tubes devoted to PR and marketing exploring why blogging matters. Eric Kintz at The Marketing Excellence Blog has put up a post that collects the thoughts of some of the brightest guys in the field right now as they explain what lessons, questions and thoughts they pull from the experience of blogging. That's been reposted by David Armano, Joe Thornley and Will Waugh. Allow me to add my own thoughts.

    When I was trying to figure out what I wanted to do with my life one of my goals was to write a column for The Chicago Tribune. I grew up with the Trib, it was a constant presence in my house as well as my grandparents' house. Going to buy the Sunday issue was a post-church tradition. As I realized that writing was something I enjoyed and was relatively good at writing for the Tribune became the goal. I realized after a while that, despite some attempts at breaking into journalism this just wasn't going to happen. Life went on. Occasionally I'd write something that looked like the type of thing I wanted to have published but that was largely for myself and never saw distribution beyond a floppy disk I saved it to.

    But then blogging took off. And I tried it out, though I was a relatively late (mid-2004) adopter. And I was hooked.

    Blogging gave me a voice. It gave people like me a voice. Part of me couldn't believe it. I had a voice. I could talk about what I wanted, what movies I was watching, what irritated me about Illinois politics and any thing else that flitted through my mind. The end result was not, let's just say, any good. It wasn't until I found a focus and figured out what exactly I was trying to say that I felt like I was doing good work. Not surprisingly that coincided with my blog finding some success. As I found my way and continued to blog I made contacts that have been extraordinarily valuable to me both personally and professionally, not the least of which is Tom Biro here at MWW Group. Blogging has undoubtedly made me a better writer and has been valuable to my life in a way little outside of my family has achieved.

    While this is a personal story the same pattern has been and can be followed by both individuals and corporations alike. Try it. Experiment. See what works and what doesn't. Find something within yourself, either as an individual or as a company, that's passionate about doing it. As my friend Mack Collier says, blogging can allow you a place to hone your skills, distill your thoughts and generally connect you to a world that has some outstanding citizens who are constantly pushing themselves - and therefore you - to think in new and exciting ways. That's been the biggest thing I've gotten out of not only blogging myself but of reading what others are doing. I've been provoked to think outside of any previous comfort zones, something that's sometimes uncomfortable and unnatural but at least it's happening, and it's happening in a place where others can add their thoughts to mine.

    There's a graphic in the print edition of this article from the Chi Trib's Steve Johnson that says, according to Pew, only 8% of Americans have a blog. While that statistic might be used by some to show that blogs are not yet mainstream, I have a question for them: What percentage of the American people have a newspaper or magazine column?

    Newsgator pretty much confirms what we thought

    Well the promised interview didn't materialize, but Newsgator founder Greg Reinacker has put up a post on his blog that deals with the addition of AdSense ads to Newsgator Online that works to confirm what we had previously been hearing and speculating. In short, AdSense ads in some shape or form are coming to NGO as part of what sounds like a period of change and evolution for the service. There's no definitive timeline or format for how these will begin appearing but they are coming. What happened last Friday was the inadvertant flipping of a switch.

    LOTD: October 24

    October 23, 2006

    What a Chicago event can show us about the new media world

    Go read this post by Frank Gruber at TechCrunch and see what it says about social media. At a recent Tech Cocktail here in Chicago, there were folks who run sites that allow the community to review restaurants, write about their home improvement experiences, come together with other fitness enthusiasts, share online video and so much more. It's like a microcosm of what's going on online with citizen journalism, social networking and the other tools and phenomena that we deal with every day.

    Following-up on Newsgator adding AdSense

    Right now it's unclear what's going on with AdSense ads being placed next to blog posts within free RSS reader Newsgator Online. Jason Calacanis says that he's hearing the fleeting appearance of such ads on Friday was a mistake and that there's nothing like this coming down the pike. But I'm hearing that this is happening officially soon. As I said before I'm going to speak to someone at Newsgator tomorrow and will have more to say after that.

    Firefox 2.0 up for download

    As our friends at Lifehacker point out, the official "launch" of Firefox 2.0 is on Tuesday (what do the think this is, the music industry?), but you can download it now, anyway. So have fun, and don't hurt yourselves, kids.

    firefoxspellcheck.JPG[update: 2:43pm] Well, it's pretty awesome that FF is now coming with a spell checker on, but I couldn't help but get a kick out of the fact that RSS wasn't included in the dictionary.

    All that's missing is "Burnt Sienna"

    Joseph Jaffe never lacks for audacity. Truly one of the more innovative thinkers around in this day and age, I’m convinced Jaffe never stops thinking new media, even when cutting grass, playing with his kids or staring out the window on a rainy day. So to Shel Holtz and Neville Hobson, the dynamic duo behind the For Immediate Release podcast as well as their own blogs. And let’s not forget CC Chapman, an outstanding podcast and blogger himself.

    The level of talent possessed by these four gentleman is what makes Crayon so exciting. Jaffe, Holtz, Hobson and Chapman have decided to go into business together, forming a sort of un-agency that, well, from what I’ve read it’s hard to describe. See, most agencies have a purpose, or at least a focus on one thing that they do and do well. Companies then hire that agency based on their doing that one thing well. Crayon, though, seems to be more malleable. Instead of a product being produced by the group, Crayon exists to:

    • Help facilitate the conversation.
    • Provide companies with a true partner, someone who will work with them to guide them in the right new media direction
    • Do whatever else needs doing
    That last point intrigues me the most. Instead of being defined by a menu of offerings like you’d find at a fast-food chain, the guys at Crayon seem to be saying, “Think big, let us figure out how to make it happen.” (Side note: $10 to the first person who asks Jaffe to script a 30-second TV commercial. Not really, but that would be awesome.) That’s actually more revolutionary than it might sound. Additionally, they are asking anyone and everyone to participate, making it almost into an open-source marketing effort.

    The agency’s debut will actually take place in Second Life, where they will maintain a permanent island-based office, this Thursday. You can count on me being there for that and many visits afterward.

    While you're waiting for that, go read the announcement posts from the principals involved.

    LOTD: October 23

    • Surely all of us, unfortunately, have heard one horror story or another (I heard another one yesterday, actually) about a problem someone had with a contractor doing work on their home or property. Much of the time, those issues are financial in nature. Well, check out this article from the Arizona Republic that discusses Construction ePay, an escrow service just for this business.
    • Women are networking online at the Downtown Women's Club, a site that the Boston Globe's Diane Lewis says allows those women to "create the 'old boys network' online."
    • Oliver Ryan is talking about how BlackPlanet.com and other social networking sites might be "potent" as rivals to MySpace and other heavy hitters, citing how niche content is being developed there.
    • Somehow I missed this item from Niall Kennedy, mentioning how now, webmasters have more control over Googlebots and the good that they do.
    • Stephen Davies wants to know about how we'd be living should our televisions be able to snag RSS and whatnot - today.
    • News.com's Michael Kanellos writes about another way to grasp what's going on in all those blogs, forums, and other online spaces - and how to dig through the clutter.

    October 20, 2006

    Newsgator adds AdSense

    newsgatorads.JPGSo here's something interesting. I pulled up Newsgator Online and opened a new folder to catch up on my afternoon reading and was greeted by a tower of AdSense ads right next to the first three posts in each folder. The tower of ads makes each item bigger, meaning the items are stretched out a bit. This is a huge deal if this is a new tactic by Newsgator to monetize their free online RSS reader. I've contacted the company to see what the story is on this in terms of a rollout system wide.

    [UPDATE] According to a spokesperson for Newsgator, this was a test that was released at about 1PM Colorado time. But it's being taken down until early next week because of the way it was affecting the formatting. More to come on this early next week when I have a chance to speak to someone at Newsgator.

    LOTD: October 20

    • 30,000 copyright-infringing videos have been removed from YouTube after a complaint, says the AP
    • A million peoples in Second Life, if you hadn't noticed already.
    • Did you catch Mark Glaser's item about how Creative Commons and Flickr users have worked together to create a great collective within that world? [via Creative Commons]
    • Geek News Central points out the awesome writeup done by Wendy Seltzer on the licensing for the new and "improved" Windows Vista.
    • Google Blogoscoped's Philipp Lenssen drills down (with a Google focus, natch) on the lack of security our online conversations really, truly have.

    October 19, 2006

    LOTD: October 19

    • The fine folks at Bloglines inform that IE7 now has a one-click subscription option for anyone landing on an RSS-enabled page that wants to use Bloglines to subscribe.
    • Remember that mention from Scoble that he would be showing a vid of his trip to Engadget's Ryan Block's house? Well, you can read more here and click through to see it.
    • I'm one of the naysayers, too, about the whole copyright issue, among others, that plague Google's acquisition of YouTube (which was $1.65 billion, by the way) - but check out what Jeremy Zawodny has to say on the subject about the whole deal. While he's right that a lot of people said exactly zero about the number of eyeballs that this means for Google, I think it's going a little far to think that people didn't notice this. A lot of us did, and there are quite a few people who brought up the bubble-icious time we're now apparently back in, which he mentions by saying "It's 1999 all over again." That's great and all, because wasn't it fun. For awhile, that is.
    • Andy Lark has found LinkedIn to be pretty helpful as well.
    • More than 80% of interested carbuyers went to the Web to check out some vehicles, says Capgemini. USA Today's Jayne O'Donnell says "Thanks to the Internet, you no longer need nerves of steel to buy a car. and it doesn't matter whether you're shopping in the new or used car markets."
    • Remember when YouTube was making deals so it could house various content online? Well, looks like not everyone else was so lucky, as Universal Music Group announced it was suing Grouper.com and Bolt.com for copyright issues.

    myESPN (beta) hits the scene

    On Tuesday, Chris was writing about how Paramount could have done a better job with a site relaunch by including RSS and other technologies, just because it would have been a good business decision. In a way, that's a way for Paramount to keep people "coming back" even if it's just to the brand's feed(s) in an RSS reader.

    This morning, David Singer pinged me about how ESPN is now in the RSS game, even more than just having various feeds on their site, with the launch of their myESPN (beta, of course). Just like your My Yahoo! allows for news, sports, weather, and other information to be customized, you can create a sports-focused landing page, with a lot of information from ESPN itself. And just like elsewhere, you can also drop your own feeds in, which we learn more about here at the FatMixx blog, written by Sujal, who is the manager of sports engineering at ESPN.com. I'm sure, as Kareem Mayan does, we'll have concerns about how they're doing things, but it's a step in the right direction, especially when most are taking no steps at all. In a way, I can see this being the first big step in Disney/ABC/ESPN putting together its own portal landing page that is fully RSSified and customizable.

    More on this later. In the meantime, you can check out what other bloggers are saying through this search at Technorati.

    [update] Over on his personal blog, David Singer has posted some really good feedback to the site. And, in really good blog fashion, developer Sujal has already posted a comment thanking him for the feedback. I, too, got a kick out of a visit I got from someone who was using myespn.go.com to read feeds. Kinda cool, in a way-too-meta sorta way.

    October 18, 2006

    RSS for the masses

    Yesterday my good friend Kirk Skodis at Film Plug pointed to the newly redesigned website for Paramount Pictures. I really like quite a bit of the new site, even beyond just the sleeker design and better overall layout it has. From a branding standpoint, it works very well, too. The main page has links to the different divisions of the studio, including Paramount Vantage (the art-house division) and Dreamworks, which Paramount recently purchased control over. It also highlights what I'd call its equity partners such as Marvel Comics, who will develop films based on their comic characters for eventual distribution through Paramount.

    But in applying new media tools the site falls short. There's at least one section that could have been completely re-imagined and, most importantly, given an RSS feed. That's the “Newswire” section. That Newswire is just screaming for an RSS feed as well as to be used more regularly. This should be utilized for not only the occasional corporate announcement of how well a certain movie did at the box office. It should be updated every time the official website for a Paramount movie gets launched or upgraded, every time there's a new trailer available, every time a poster gets released and any time there's any other sort of announcement regarding the marketing a movie being created by the studio. And don't get me started on how it could be used for production updates. That's a whole other discussion.

    More and more companies are discovering that blogs or, at the very least, RSS-enabled news pages, are a valuable asset. They allow the company, through either a junior-level staffer or the CEO, to speak directly to the consumer. Specifically, it allows them to speak to a sub-set of that consumer base that's especially interested in that company or industry. A sub-set of that audience is also blogging about their interests and passions. That turns the company into a wire service in and of itself, distributing news on a regular basis to a citizen press corps which is happy to get such updates and, when they're interesting enough, pass them on to their readers. Just like the traditional relationship between the PR industry and the mainstream press, only replicated X number of times.

    By not setting such systems of news distribution up, companies are sending the following two messages out to the public: 1) We'll decide who we speak directly to, thank you very much and 2) If you're not in that group we're going to force you to come to our page and spend an hour poking around to see if there's anything new, which there might not even be.

    Here's something I said a while ago to a group of people: If a corporate site doesn't have RSS, it just don't exist to me. I have chosen which sites to subscribe to and keeping up with them takes up most of the time I have set aside for reading and information gathering. I don't have time to go and poke around a non RSS-enabled site for what's new. I need those updates delivered to me. By not doing so the company only increases my reliance – and brand allegiance – to those sites it has deemed worthy of communicating directly with. That's because those sites do have RSS feeds, and that's where I get my news.

    And don't try to say “Well not everyone is hooked into RSS and that's why we don't use it.” Go to FeedBurner or FeedBlitz. They allow you to create a feed that also can be turned into an email newsletter. So that excuse just doesn't hold water. Just because not everyone uses it doesn't mean that 1) they won't one day or 2) that you're not turning off audiences that do.

    If a company really wants to communicate with its audiences, both passive and active, it would be wise to figure out how to do so in a manner that's useful to the whole audience. Even more than that, look at the tools that also have the advantage of empowering the active part of that audience, the group that's blogging, to help spread the word about the company. It's well past time to move beyond “push” corporate communications and let people “pull” what they want and when they want it.

    October 17, 2006

    NYT embraces YouTube

    In this story on corporate mergers and other deals, the New York Times did something rather remarkable. They embedded a YouTube video within the online story.

    I have to say my first reaction to this was, "Wow!" It's so odd - but great - to see a mainstream outlet embrace the same tools and toys that the online community is already using like this. This is just the kind of added value that can be created for readers of the online version of the paper and begin to drive visitors.

    [Hat tip to Rex Sorgatz]

    LOTD: October 17

    • Nick Bradbury and his son, Isaac, were in a car accident - a hit-and-run, no less - on Monday night, and both are okay. Our best wishes for the both of them from here at OTD, and we're glad that all is well. I'm guessing you know your kid is okay after a car accident when he's "elated" that he gets to not go to school for the day. And for those of you who notice these things, note that Nick states "(I'm glad I bought a Volvo)" in his blog entry.
    • Jeremy Pepper weighs in a little bit on the Edelman - Wal-Marting kerfluffle. My concern here is how long it took to get the "facts" on the situation.
    • Chris points out this item from Tuesday's Los Angeles Times, where Patrick Goldstein discusses how people go to YouTube for a replay of just about everything. I can't say I'm in disagreement.
    • The Arizona Republic is running some new blogs
    • The ever-fantastic eHub leads us to Quotiki, the quote search engine.
    • News.com's Elinor Mills writes about how Google - YouTube might look, feel, and work.
    • Jason Calacanis [disclaimer: I do some work for both the Weblogs, Inc. and Netscape brands] is talking about the pain in the backside that iTunes is. And it is.
    • Over at the Google Talk blog, talkabout, Lewis Lin is asking how you use Google Talk.

    October 16, 2006

    Journalists are still - and always will be - important

    Josh Hallett has an interesting bit of thinking-out-loud up regarding the relationship between journalist and hyper-local or hyper-niche citizen blogger. He points out that, because he is not a full-time journalist, he has neither the time nor the resources to always do all the digging and reporting that a story might require and so often does the best he can and then tries to hand the issue off to the community to fill in the blanks. That, if for no other reason, is why there will always be a place in the media world for professionals.

    But those professionals will need to know where to turn to fill in their own knowledge gaps as well. That's because the citizenry, the ones who live in the communities or who have a niche interest, are going to be powerful within that niche. Mainstream media outlets simply don't have the resources to get as minutely specific as blogging allows for. So not only is Josh smart for knowing what he doesn't know and reaching out for input, so to should reporters learn to know what they don't know and search for those who do. The reality is that professional journalists have the tools to do some jobs better than bloggers and I don't see that changing soon. But niche bloggers have the time and the passion to cover topics or angles that big news organizations just can't because the return on investment is too low or even non-existent.

    I'm increasingly of the opinion, though, that within a generation it won't be the publication that matters so much to people as it will be the filters they choose to put in place or receive their news and other content through. Google News, Technorati and other such services/sites are becoming the new "source." It won't matter to someone in the Tampa area whether the news they receive comes from the Tampa Tribune or a local-issues blogger like Hallett. They will be interested in news on "Tampa," subscribe to the aggregators that can bring that news to them and then assign value to the content as they go.

    People's time is important - and scarce. Whoever can provide the most value in that time will win the battle for their attention. As we become more and more used to picking and choosing what we read the outlets that provide that value will dominate the discussion but I think we need to look for a time when media brands are secondary to the quality of the content they produce.

    Reuters keeps Second Life residents in the loop

    Beginning Wednesday, news service Reuters is opening an official bureau within Second Life to keep residents up to speed with what's happening in the real world and real world readers informed of Second Life news. In true community-building form, residents who click on an item that's of interest to them will be taken to the Reuters Atrium where they can discuss the story and others with fellow residents. The bulk of the heavy lifting on this will be done by Reuters correspondent Adam Pasick, who will operate in-world as Adam Reuters. Adam will hold regular office hours in Second Life in order to actually gather news just like any other reporter.

    The idea of bridging the real/virtual divide is one that is likely to get quite a bit of attention. While it's not a new idea in and of itself, (New World Notes and Second Life Herald have been doing so for a while now) being able to stay up to date with the real world in an efficient manner will facilitate people spending more time within those environments.

    LOTD: October 16

    • (RED) launched a few days ago with much fanfare, primarily driven by The Gap's advertising and product set. You can keep an eye on what's happening with all that over at (BLOG) RED
    • Mack Collier has an interview up that he did with Nettwerk Music Group's Terry McBride
    • Scoble, who's always finding these things, links to an item on the Flickr blog about a person who posted his works on the photo sharing site, and was chosen to take part in an exhibition
    • While we're Scobleizing, I've gotta say that while I do get the off request from someone I don't know on LinkedIn for things, I don't have this kind of opinion about the social networking site. Hell, I got this job because of my profile on LinkedIn, so even if that's the only huge thing that happens to me through the system, that's more than enough.
    • Second Life Insider is covering the news that the dollars being "spent" both virtually, and in the real world, for goods and services in massive multiplayer games, may end up being taxed, somehow or other. More here.

    October 12, 2006

    LOTD: October 12

    • Check out GetVendors. I can't say exactly how I think this will end up working, though it seems like a neat idea, as far as improving the "directory" system we all live in. You know, the one that some of us older than like 20 call the "yellow pages." [via Emily Chang's fantastic eHub]
    • Scoble points to an exceptionally fun episode of GETV where Irina Slutsky gets to, you guessed it, "ask a ninja" about stuff. Go, Irina & Eddie & Co!
    • Duct Tape Marketing's John Jantsch is talking about how to use a business plan as a marketing tool
    • YouTube's founders might be all giggly over the recent deal to sell to Google, but that hasn't stopped the community from being concerned about what it *really* means for them.
    • Over at Channel 9, Sven Groot is bugged by some of the strange bugs he's coming across in Vista. Howabout y'all?
    • .mobi domains came not too long ago, and they were marketed out the wazoo. Did you get one? Todd Cochrane is making a nice, cogent statement about purchasing them, which is relevant if you're a business. Now, if we could only get site devs to start regularly creating mobile content...
    • In Thursday's Guardian, Miles Brignall is discussing the importance of being able to prove your company is "green." While he's specifically referring to the Advertising Standards Authority across the pond, that doesn't mean it isn't something to think about, as everyone's trying to "do better" with the environment these days.
    • Speaking of mobile devices, according to this item by News.com's Elinor Mills, Ask.com will have a nifty mobile version that you can grab on the fly, and is all set up for you to use while you're on the small screen.

    October 11, 2006

    LOTD: October 11 - Picking on stuff edition

    You'll figure out the theme pretty quickly, trust me.

    • Fast Company's blog picks up on how Universal Music's eLabs EVP Amanda Marks iwas talking about how P2P was "irrelevant." Umm, yeah. Apparently, she doesn't spend much time on the torrent servers. Sorry, no soup for you.
    • Good job, Google. You've just picked up YouTube. Are you going to Disneyworld? Nah, says Paul La Monica at CNNMoney, because the next bubble is in online video, of course. Oh, okay. Maybe Google will make it to Disneyworld, but no one else will be there.
    • So, Yahoo!, now that Google's gone and done something big, what are you gonna do? Man, let's not forget they picked up broadcast.com WAY before any of this stuff was hot, okay.
    • Sorry, Microsoft. You're trying really, really hard to make things work, especially with regard to RSS and such. But it's not cutting it, at least in the eyes of Andy Lark, who sees some issues with how various tools are integrating with Outlook, IE7, etc.

    So much for Writely - but yay for Google

    I've been using Writely, the online word processing program, for a while now. I love having all - or at least most of the functionality of a word processing program online. Earlier this year Writely was bought by Google and then a couple weeks ago they finally integrated with the Google accounts of its users. But that didn't change much about the look and feel of the system.

    Until today. This morning when I went to writely.com it redirected to docs.google.com. All my documents were there, just as they had been, along with the Google Spreadsheets I had in my account. This is just the sort of integrated functionality I've been looking for from Google since I can now access my Calendar, Docs and Picasa photos all from the Gmail page I open as soon as I sit down at the computer.

    Great move by Google to make sure their features are as easy to use as possible. As more of us spend out entire days online using Web 2.0-ish apps this a handy way to put everything Google offers in one convenient place.

    October 10, 2006

    Measuring success in a "Web 2.0" world

    As I get back into a regular swing of things as far as blogging goes on this site, I'm attempting to clear out all the things I've tagged and bagged to post about soon, and I'm just about cleared out at this point. One last item I had sitting in FeedDemon was this post from Robert Scoble from *way* back on September 28 (gasp!) regarding the "success" - or not - of the Diggnation video podcast, and he is asking what readers think of comments made here by WaggEd's Frank Shaw on the subject. Frank asks:

    If "Diggnation" were on a national cable or broadcast feed, would 250k viewers be seen as success or the road to to cancellation?

    I'll answer first with my initial thoughts on the subject. Who cares if it would get cancelled on regular television? Frankly, we live in a world now where shows - take NBC's Kidnapped, for instance - are cancelled at the first threat that they could potentially suck in the eyes of viewers. And to think, a show was put together with Timothy Hutton, Dana Delany, Jeremy Sisto, Delroy Lindo, and others turned out to be, more or less, an abject failure. How much money went into the production of the thirteen episodes we'll see, plus the significant dollars that Sony Pictures Television put into promoting it, along with two of its other shows on the networks this year? And still, we have a group of television developers who don't know what people are going to like, and even if they do, television executives are sometimes quick on the draw, not realizing that they have maxed out the potential audience for that particular program. The latter part of that statement is what's most important.

    Let's get back to Diggnation here. So if there are 250,000 downloads (!) of the podcast (which is in both audio and video versions, btw), let's say most people watch at least part of it. Just as the commenter's on Scoble's site are saying, it's not about "broadcasting" here, even though the show is out there for anyone to view and download. It's not even about "narrowcasting" here either, as the show is clearly getting the same kind of viewership as daytime cable news might be getting. If we were able to measure exactly who would be the "target" audience for the Diggnation show, and 250,000 were 50% of that audience, would it be a success? What defines success, anyway, that a certain number that makes sense to someone who is counting beans says is a good amount of viewership / listenership? It just seems so random, when you try and look at the "big media" numbers and apply them to something like a video podcast, and say "well, that would have failed if it were on television." Who cares? A medium that can't measure properly (sorry, start counting time-shifted / DVR'd programs properly and then we'll talk) shouldn't be used as the measuring stick for other media. Ever.

    Something that I have a had a pretty good amount of success educating colleagues and clients on, when it comes to blogs (that we're outreaching to or developing for them) is not to look at the numbers as too high or too low. The example I use is something like the $10,000 / year journal that is printed four times, and goes to 500 people, worldwide. In that case, forget the cost, and look at the number. If I'm an advertiser or someone looking to get a client or piece of information into the editorial, that 500 can't seem small, if it encompasses the entire group or population that is interested in said topic. In that same vein, there are blogs that are about marketing, for instance, that are read by either a) the entire audience (or the bulk of it) that are interested in reading about it from that perspective, or b) the other "thought leaders" within the space. Ignore the fact that it might get 1,000 visitors a day. 1,000 doesn't mean it's a small readership. Compare it to passalong rates, if you are looking for something similar.

    My colleague and fellow blogger here, Chris Thilk, had some thoughts that I wanted to drop in here as well.

    It’s all about the niche. What’s the difference between Diggnation and USA Today if each one only reaches ¼ of your target audience?

    I think the most effective product releases or announcements are going to be the ones that target the people who are already engaging in a conversation about that industry/product. That means giving people who might not be in the Technorati 100 access to something new and then working with them to make the announcement as effective as possible. Not everything is going to have a wide audience and Diggnation, USA Today and TechCrunch all are models of mass-distribution in their particular media.

    Chris wanted to take a little bit different of tack on this, saying that while Diggnation might have a significant reach within the online / tech space, it doesn't mean it's the end-all, be-all, for what you might be trying to get out there, news-wise. Same with a TechCrunch. Sure, get your story on TechCrunch, and you're *going* to get attention, but that doesn't mean that your conversation will start and end on that particular site. At the same time, he echoes what I was suggesting about Diggnation - to some, it represents a "mass" distribution opportunity, rather than having something show up on 50 blogs that all get a few thousand visitors each. Sometimes, "breaking" news on a TechCrunch, PaidContent or somewhere else with a wide audience is your best bet. But, as we have discussed before, sometimes you get a much better effect in the long run if you have a stack of people - all who are read by those particular sites or the site you are "aspirational" to reach - all write about what you have to say.

    At the end of the day, I'd have to give Diggnation a thumbs up when it comes to being a success, because I don't believe that something has to be on television to be that huge of a success in the world today, and comparing it to television isn't apples to apples. If all television content were "on demand," as it were, this might be a different discussion. I'm a subscriber, regularly describe the show as "hysterical" to anyone I've shown it to, and explain to people that it's pretty similar to any kind of roundup-type show that you might see on television, this time giving the nod to big stories that have been on Digg recently - oh, and there's beer.

    Moral to the story? Let's forget about trying to compare model to model, and look at what a particular marketplace is on its own merit, and how any particular instance of reach into that market compares to another in the same space. It might be sheer numbers of reader/listener/viewership, it might be products sold, dollars spent, or whatever. But please, stop making everything sound like "well, 2 million people watched so and so on NBC last night."

    I saw an engagment once...

    Michael Palmer at ANA Marketing Maestros is calling out Steve Rubel over his assertion that "engagement," an ill-defined and illusive beast, is a "myth." Rubel says true engagement is something that comes about after marketers cede power to the audience. The only actions by a marketing team should be, Steve says, to create the tools for customer evangelists to spread the word and then the monitoring and measuring of how they're doing so. It seems to me Steve has the same view of marketing as those who believe in the "clockmaker" version of God, one who set the world in motion and is now detached from the day to day goings-on.

    But what neither Palmer nor Rubel talk about is the squishy middle that exists between "creating the right programs" and "measuring the results." That's an important omission since that's where the possibility for true engagement lies.

    Let me use an example. If I want to write about a new marketing campaign on my blog I would be thrilled to have available to me a set of tools such as embeddable video, high quality graphics and detailed product information which I could use and link to. That's the first step a company could take. Monitoring is the second and involves marketers needing to know how to use the tools available to them to most effectively do so. But the next step is not measurement and evaluation. That next step is where engagement comes into play.

    Engagement to me means when a company or marketer reaches out to the participants of the conversation and gives them a pat on the back, follows up with more information or updates, writes in to correct something that's wrong or otherwise makes themselves available as a resource. There's very little that gets me more excited than getting contacted by someone I've written about. That shows me they're monitoring and want to engage in a dialogue. Building those relationships is beneficial to everyone since the company can be more certain of an accurate message being communicated and the writer gets a whole new stream of good information to draw from.

    I don't know how many companies are doing that but I suspect it's not nearly as many as should be. But it's the most important step in engaging with the audience and one that turns the ephemeral engagement beast into something tangible. Monitoring and evaluation then can show points of contact can highlight the affect those contacts had, something that is important for any marketing team to be able to show.

    LOTD: October 10 - Google+YouTube Edition

    • Yeah, yeah, Google, YouTube, blah blah blah. Oh, wait. See what the founders have to say about the merger.
    • Much like myself, Nick Bradbury wonders whether or not YouTube's purchase by Google will make it more or less likely that copyrighted content will stick on the site in the long term or not.
    • In case you didn't notice, lawmakers and other politicians have caught on to YouTube's popularity.
    • The BBC's Tim Weber calls this deal "Google's gamble"
    • Ryan Block, apparently on the same wavelength as Chris and I on this situation, sums it up by saying "Not since my employer, AOL, bought Time Warner for about $160b have we seen such silliness."
    • Over at TechCrunch, Mike Arrington is asking about any notions that FOX is a "factor" in the Google / YouTube deal. Oh, and that whole copyright infringement thing.

    October 09, 2006

    You got your Google in my YouTube!

    Well it's official. After a few days of speculation (which seem like an eternity if measured in number of RSS feed refreshes) Google has paid $1.65 billion for YouTube, the largest acquisition the search-focused company has made to date. YouTube will retain its staff as well as its brand name.

    I'll be honest with everyone here and say out loud that this deal never made sense to me from the moment it was first speculated on. Google has a video sharing site already, even if it falls far short in usability and popularity from YouTube. For Google to let the site exist as its own independent brand does little for the Google brand name in terms of added value and, considering that, it seemed like an adversely large responsibility to take on. I know that YouTube has vast and as yet untapped potential for making money but I never really bought that search ads would be enough to really make this purchase worth it. It might pay for itself in four or five year, as Jason Calacanis, but can any of us predict what the media landscape will look like at that point?

    I've even been thinking about it for days now and I still don't see the advantages for Google in this deal. The only things they've just bought themselves, to my thinking, are more work for their servers and their copyright attorneys. Google must see the upside in this but it's eluding me. It will be interesting to see how this partnership develops over the next few months. Will AdSense ads pop up on every page? Will Google Video disappear? Will this mean more sponsored "channels" on YouTube? Only time will tell and I'll be anxious to be shown how this plays out.