<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs and PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openthedialogue.com/2006/02/blogs-and-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openthedialogue.com/2006/02/blogs-and-pr/</link>
	<description>Digital media tools, solutions and strategies from MWW Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.openthedialogue.com/2006/02/blogs-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staging.zubrcom.net/openthedialogue/?p=88#comment-50</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve seen OZ, right Tom?

And, Keith, you&#039;re right. It depends on the story, the audience. If I have an executive to respond to another post, should I offer them up? If not, why not? What are the rules in blog interaction - we are learning as we move forward, and while I have the luxury of somewhat getting it (who really gets it?), I know that there are still curveballs out there.

At least I&#039;m not going to pound my chest as an expert, like others, when it would be hard to really say what blogs are successes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve seen OZ, right Tom?</p>
<p>And, Keith, you&#8217;re right. It depends on the story, the audience. If I have an executive to respond to another post, should I offer them up? If not, why not? What are the rules in blog interaction &#8211; we are learning as we move forward, and while I have the luxury of somewhat getting it (who really gets it?), I know that there are still curveballs out there.</p>
<p>At least I&#8217;m not going to pound my chest as an expert, like others, when it would be hard to really say what blogs are successes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Run</title>
		<link>http://www.openthedialogue.com/2006/02/blogs-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staging.zubrcom.net/openthedialogue/?p=88#comment-51</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dear John Letters, M&amp;A Comes to PR!, and It Just Doesn&#8217;t Matter (apologies to Meatballs)&lt;/strong&gt;

Marketing Begins at Home: Dear Baconâ€™s
While MediaListsOnline is a great tool &#8230; it&#8217;s a tool that is stuck back in the 90&#8217;s. David Parmet has learned the fun way that there&#8217;s no real way to do searches on terms that he needs. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear John Letters, M&#038;A Comes to PR!, and It Just Doesn&#8217;t Matter (apologies to Meatballs)</strong></p>
<p>Marketing Begins at Home: Dear Baconâ€™s<br />
While MediaListsOnline is a great tool &#8230; it&#8217;s a tool that is stuck back in the 90&#8217;s. David Parmet has learned the fun way that there&#8217;s no real way to do searches on terms that he needs. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.openthedialogue.com/2006/02/blogs-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staging.zubrcom.net/openthedialogue/?p=88#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Good point, Mike (and Tom, above). The question I pose, then, is when all of these communities have ample opportunities to engage themselves with or without corporate/PR agency help, what is that value-add to participate? Is it products? Is it press releases? Is it sit-downs with executives? The answer depends on the environment, but, also, the answer is not simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Mike (and Tom, above). The question I pose, then, is when all of these communities have ample opportunities to engage themselves with or without corporate/PR agency help, what is that value-add to participate? Is it products? Is it press releases? Is it sit-downs with executives? The answer depends on the environment, but, also, the answer is not simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.openthedialogue.com/2006/02/blogs-and-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staging.zubrcom.net/openthedialogue/?p=88#comment-48</guid>
		<description>It seems that a lot of us are still caught up with the push-centric models of traditional media relations, where disruption is the tactic and the â€œaudienceâ€ is just the receptacle for a â€œpitch.â€  The problem is that this way of thinking just doesn&#039;t translate well when bloggers are the audience.

I think when it comes to effectively engaging this community, we need to focus more on pull-centric models where inclusion is the tactic, and we create and host conversations, verses trying to insert ourselves in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that a lot of us are still caught up with the push-centric models of traditional media relations, where disruption is the tactic and the â€œaudienceâ€ is just the receptacle for a â€œpitch.â€  The problem is that this way of thinking just doesn&#8217;t translate well when bloggers are the audience.</p>
<p>I think when it comes to effectively engaging this community, we need to focus more on pull-centric models where inclusion is the tactic, and we create and host conversations, verses trying to insert ourselves in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
